Back to pitch deck

HomeCare Market Research & Opportunity Analysis

Deep Research for Pre-Seed Pitch Deck | April 2026


1. The $88B Problem — Cost of Inaction

Preventable home emergencies cost the US healthcare system $88B+ per year. This figure represents the total economic burden across three major threat categories affecting seniors living at home.

Cost Breakdown by Threat Category

Threat Annual Cost Deaths/yr Key Stat Source
Falls $50B (conservative; updated CDC data shows ~$80B) 41,400 14M seniors fall annually; 50% can't get up alone; 3M+ ER visits CDC NCHS Data Brief 2023, Florence et al. 2018
Delayed Discovery $30B+ (worsened outcomes from late response) Included in falls/other ~500K long-lie incidents/yr; mortality jumps dramatically with discovery time BMC Geriatrics 2023 Scoping Review
Home Fires $8.4B property damage (~$8.9B avg 2019-2023) 3,500 Seniors have 2-4x fire death rate; 85+ have 3.2x overall rate NFPA Home Structure Fires

Deep Dive: How the $50B Falls Figure Is Calculated

Primary source: Florence CS, Bergen G, Atherly A, et al. "Medical Costs of Fatal and Nonfatal Falls in Older Adults." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2018.

Data year: 2015

Methodology: Quasi-experimental regression analysis comparing total healthcare spending of older adults who experienced falls against a matched control group who did not fall, isolating the incremental cost attributable to falls.

Data sources used:

Cost breakdown by payer:

Payer Amount Share
Medicare $28.9B 58%
Medicaid $8.7B 17%
Private + other payers $12.0B 24%
Fatal falls (all payers) $0.754B 1%
Total ~$50.0B 100%

What IS included:

What is NOT included (making $50B conservative):

Updated to $80B (2024 CDC Study)

A 2024 CDC study recalculated using 2020 data and found non-fatal falls alone now cost approximately $80B/year:

Component Amount
Medicare + Medicaid $57B
Private + other payers $23B
Total (non-fatal only) ~$80B

Acute care breakdown: 922,428 inpatient visits + 2.3M ED visits = $19.8B in acute care costs alone

Why the jump from $50B → $80B in 5 years:

  1. Population growth — 6M more Americans over 65 between 2015 and 2020
  2. Healthcare cost inflation — medical costs rose ~20% in the period
  3. Better data capture — 2020 study captured more outpatient and rehabilitation costs that were undercounted in 2015
  4. Longer survival with disability — more falls resulting in expensive long-term care rather than death

What This Means for the Pitch

The $50B on the slide is the peer-reviewed, CDC-backed, conservative figure. In investor conversations, the follow-up is:

"We use $50B because it's the most-cited peer-reviewed number. But the CDC's own 2024 update puts non-fatal falls alone at $80B. Add delayed discovery costs and home fires, and the real number is likely $120B+. Our $88B headline is deliberately conservative."

Investor takeaway: The $88B figure is likely conservative. Using updated CDC data, falls alone cost ~$80B, making the real total closer to $120B+.


2. Current Prevention Spending — The $2B Gap

While the problem costs $88B+, current spending on prevention technology is only ~$2B in the US. This 44:1 ratio between damage and prevention is the core market opportunity.

Where Prevention Dollars Go Today

Category US Market Size (2024) CAGR Projected Size
PERS / Medical Alert Systems ~$1.7-2.4B 5.1-6.4% $2.2B (2029)
Remote Patient Monitoring ~$14.2B 12.8% $29.1B (2030)
Aging-in-Place Technology ~$9.1B 15.1% $15.2B (2033)
Smart Home Healthcare $5.9B (global) 8.95%

The Critical Distinction: Treatment vs. Prevention

Spending Type Annual Amount Category
Medicare/Medicaid on fall-related treatment $57B Reactive (after the fall)
Private payer fall treatment $23B Reactive (after the fall)
Total reactive spending $80B Treating consequences
PERS devices (prevention tech) ~$2B Proactive (before the fall)
Prevention-to-treatment ratio 1:40 Massive underinvestment

Investor takeaway: The healthcare system spends $80B treating falls but only ~$2B trying to prevent them. Every $1 invested in prevention technology that reduces falls by even 10% would save $8 in treatment costs.

Why Prevention Spending Is So Low

  1. Medicare doesn't cover PERS — Original Medicare excludes personal emergency response systems. Only some Medicare Advantage plans cover them.
  2. Legacy tech doesn't work — 80% of falls happen without the pendant being worn or pressed.
  3. No passive alternatives existed — Until radar-based monitoring, the only options were cameras (rejected for privacy) or wearables (rejected for compliance).
  4. Reimbursement codes catching up — New CMS RPM codes (2024-2026) are lowering thresholds for remote monitoring reimbursement.

3. The Demographic Tsunami — Why Now

US Population 65+ Growth

Year Population 65+ % of Total Milestone
2020 55.8M 16.8% Fastest decade of growth since 1880-1890
2024 61.2M 18.2% Current
2025 ~62.7M 18.6%
2030 71.6M 20.7% 1 in 5 Americans will be 65+; all Baby Boomers over 65
2035 78.0M 22.1% Older adults outnumber children for first time in US history

10-year growth (2024→2035): +28% — adding 16.8M people to the 65+ cohort.

The Fastest-Growing Segments Are the Most Vulnerable

Age Group Growth Rate Why It Matters
65-74 ~2.5% CAGR Largest segment, beginning to need monitoring
75-84 ~3% annually Primary buyer segment — families seeking solutions
85+ ~5% annually through 2030 Highest fall risk, highest fire death rate, most likely to live alone

Key Demographic Stats for Investors

Stat Value Source
Seniors living alone 16.2M (28% of 65+ population) ACL Profile 2023
Have no alert system ~90% TheSeniorList 2023
Pendant non-activation 80% Fleming & Brayne BMJ 2008 / JMIR 2021
Want to age in place 75% of adults 50+ AARP 2024
Americans turning 65 daily ~10,000 Ongoing since 2011

4. Market Sizing — TAM / SAM / SOM

Total Addressable Market (TAM)

Market Size Timeframe Growth
US Home Healthcare $162B 2024 9.8% CAGR → $284B by 2030
Global Elderly Monitoring $9.52B 2034 projection From $3.84B (2025)
Global Ambient Assisted Living $132B 2024 30.8% CAGR
US Gerontechnology $69.6B 2024 13.0% CAGR → $245.6B by 2033

Serviceable Addressable Market (SAM)

Segment US Market CAGR Why Relevant
PERS / Medical Alerts $2B 5-6% Direct replacement — HomeCare is "PERS 2.0"
Remote Patient Monitoring $14.2B 12.8% RPM codes enable subscription revenue
Aging-in-Place Technology $9.1B 15.1% HomeCare's core value proposition

Combined SAM: ~$25B (US), growing at ~12% CAGR

Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM) — First 3 Years

Target Population Penetration Revenue Potential
US seniors living alone, 75+ ~7M households 0.1% (7,000 units) ~$2.8M hardware + $2.4M ARR
B2B: US home care agencies ~33,000 agencies 0.5% (165 agencies x 20 units) ~$1.3M hardware + $1.2M ARR
Year 3 combined ~$4.1M hardware + $3.6M ARR

5. Regulatory Tailwinds

CMS Remote Patient Monitoring Expansion (2024-2026)

Code Description Reimbursement Impact
CPT 99453 RPM device setup $19.32 One-time per patient
CPT 99454 RPM device supply (monthly) $55.92/mo Recurring — covers device cost
CPT 99457 RPM treatment management (first 20 min) $50.94/mo Recurring — clinical oversight
CPT 99458 RPM additional 20 min $41.17/mo Additional revenue

Monthly reimbursement per patient: up to $148/mo — far exceeding HomeCare's €29/mo subscription price.

Investor takeaway: CMS reimbursement alone could cover HomeCare's entire subscription cost and then some. This creates a path to $0 out-of-pocket for the consumer — the ultimate adoption accelerator.

State-Level Initiatives


6. The Investment Thesis — Numbers That Matter

The Gap Equation

Factor Value
Problem cost $88B+ / year (conservative; likely $120B+ with updated data)
Prevention spending ~$2B / year
Gap ratio 44:1 (or 60:1 with updated figures)
Population growth +28% by 2035
Current solutions Fundamentally broken (80% pendant non-activation)
Regulatory tailwind CMS RPM codes enable $148/mo reimbursement
Big Tech Retreated (Amazon, Google, Best Buy all exited 2024-2025)

Why This Market Tips Now (2026)

  1. Technology inflection — 60GHz radar sensors hit consumer price points (~$15/chip) for the first time in 2024-2025.
  2. Demographic inflection — All Baby Boomers will be 65+ by 2030. The 85+ segment grows at 5%/yr.
  3. Regulatory inflection — CMS RPM codes create reimbursement pathway that didn't exist 2 years ago.
  4. Competitive vacuum — Big Tech retreated; legacy PERS broken; AI startups B2B-only.
  5. Cultural inflection — 75% of seniors want to age in place, but families need peace of mind.

The $2B → $25B Opportunity

The PERS market ($2B) is mature and growing slowly (5-6%). But it's being absorbed into the larger aging-in-place technology market ($9.1B, 15% CAGR) and remote patient monitoring market ($14.2B, 12.8% CAGR). The convergence creates a $25B+ opportunity.


7. Summary — Key Numbers for the Pitch Deck

Metric Value Source Year
Annual cost of preventable home emergencies $88B+ 2023 composite
Current prevention technology spending ~$2B 2024
Prevention-to-treatment spending ratio 1:40 Derived
US population 65+ (2024) 61.2M Census 2024
US population 65+ (2030) 71.6M (+17%) Census projection
US population 65+ (2035) 78.0M (+28%) Census projection
Seniors living alone 16.2M ACL 2023
Without any alert system ~90% Survey 2023
Pendant non-activation during falls 80% BMJ 2008 / JMIR 2021
Want to age in place 75% AARP 2024
RPM reimbursement potential $148/mo per patient CMS 2024
Combined SAM ~$25B (US) 2024 composite
SAM CAGR ~12% Weighted average
Aging-in-place tech CAGR 15.1% Market research 2024
85+ segment growth ~5%/yr Census projection

Sources: CDC, CMS, US Census Bureau, NFPA, AARP, ACL, BMJ, JMIR Aging, BMC Geriatrics, Grand View Research, MarketsandMarkets, Market Data Forecast, S&P Global, Straits Research, Data M Intelligence, TheSeniorList.